evolution and ethics and other essays-第34部分

快捷操作: 按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页 按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页 按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部! 如果本书没有阅读完，想下次继续接着阅读，可使用上方 "收藏到我的浏览器" 功能 和 "加入书签" 功能！


capital　while　the　great　St。　Gothard　tunnel　was　cut。　Suppose　that；　as
the　Swiss　and　the　Italian　halves　of　the　tunnel　approached　to　within
half　a　kilometre；　that　half…kilometre　had　turned　out　to　be　composed　of
practically　impenetrable　rockwould　anybody　have　given　a　centime　for
the　unfinished　tunnel？　And　if　not；　how　comes　it　that　〃the　creation　of
value　does　not　depend　on　the　finishing　of　the　product〃？

I　think　it　may　be　not　too　much　to　say　that；　of　all　the　political
delusions　which　are　current　in　this　queer　world；　the　very　stupidest
are　those　which　assume　that　labour　and　capital　are　necessarily
antagonistic；　that　all　capital　is　produced　by　labour　and　therefore；　by
natural　right；　is　the　property　of　＇187＇　the　labourer；　that　the
possessor　of　capital　is　a　robber　who　preys　on　the　workman　and
appropriates　to　himself　that　which　he　has　had　no　share　in　producing。

On　the　contrary；　capital　and　labour　are；　necessarily；　close　allies；
capital　is　never　a　product　of　human　labour　alone；　it　exists　apart　from
human　labour；　it　is　the　necessary　antecedent　of　labour；　and　it
furnishes　the　materials　on　which　labour　is　employed。　The　only
indispensable　form　of　capitalvital　capitalcannot　be　produced　by
human　labour。　All　that　man　can　do　is　to　favour　its　formation　by　the
real　producers。　There　is　no　intrinsic　relation　between　the　amount　of
labour　bestowed　on　an　article　and　its　value　in　exchange。　The　claim　of
labour　to　the　total　result　of　operations　which　are　rendered　possible
only　by　capital　is　simply　an　a　priori　iniquity。

＇188＇


　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　V。

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　SOCIAL　DISEASES　AND　WORSE　REMEDIES

　　　　　　　　LETTERS　TO　THE　〃TIMES〃　ON　MR。　BOOTH'S　SCHEME。
　　　　　　　　　　　WITH　A　PREFACE　AND　INTRODUCTORY　ESSAY。

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　＇1891＇

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　PREFACE

The　letters　which　are　here　collected　together　were　published　in　the
〃Times〃　in　the　course　of　the　months　of　December；　1890；　and　January；
1891。

The　circumstances　which　led　me　to　write　the　first　letter　are
sufficiently　set　forth　in　its　opening　sentences；　and　the　materials　on
which　I　based　my　criticisms　of　Mr。　Booth's　scheme；　in　this　and　in　the
second　letter；　were　wholly　derived　from　Mr。　Booth's　book。　I　had　some
reason　to　know；　however；　that　when　anybody　allows　his　sense　of　duty　so
far　to　prevail　over　his　sense　of　the　blessedness　of　peace　as　to　write
a　letter　to　the　〃Times；〃　on　any　subject　of　public　interest；　his
reflections；　before　he　has　done　with　the　business；　will　be　very　like
＇189＇　those　of　Johnny　Gilpin；　〃who　little　thought；　when　he　set　out；　of
running　such　a　rig。〃　Such　undoubtedly　are　mine　when　I　contemplate
these　twelve　documents；　and　call　to　mind　the　distinct　addition　to　the
revenue　of　the　Post　Office　which　must　have　accrued　from　the　mass　of
letters　and　pamphlets　which　have　been　delivered　at　my　door；　to　say
nothing　of　the　unexpected　light　upon　my　character；　motives；　and
doctrines；　which　has　been　thrown　by　some　of　the　〃Times'〃
correspondents；　and　by　no　end　of　comments　elsewhere。

If　self…knowledge　is　the　highest　aim　of　man；　I　ought　by　this　time　to
have　little　to　learn。　And　yet；　if　I　am　awake；　some　of　my
teachersunable；　perhaps；　to　control　the　divine　fire　of　the　poetic
imagination　which　is　so　closely　akin　to；　if　not　a　part　of；　the
mythopoeic　facultyhave　surely　dreamed　dreams。　So　far　as　my　humbler
and　essentially　prosaic　faculties　of　observation　and　comparison　go；
plain　facts　are　against　them。　But；　as　I　may　be　mistaken；　I　have
thought　it　well　to　prefix　to　the　letters　（by　way　of　〃Prolegomena〃）　an
essay　which　appeared　in　the　〃Nineteenth　Century〃　for　January；　1888；　in
which　the　principles　that；　to　my　mind；　lie　at　the　bottom　of　the
〃social　question〃　are　stated。　So　far　as　Individualism　and　Regimental
Socialism　are　concerned；　this　paper　simply　emphasizes　and　expands　the
opinions　expressed　in　an　address　to　the　members　of　the　Midland
Institute；　delivered　seventeen　years　earlier；　＇190＇　and　still　more
fully　developed　in　several　essays　published　in　the　〃Nineteenth
Century〃　in　1889；　which　I　hope；　before　long；　to　republish。*

　　　　*　See　Collected　Essays；　vol。　i。　p。　290　to　end；　and　this　volume；
　　　　p。　147。

The　fundamental　proposition　which　runs　through　the　writings；　which
thus　extend　over　a。　of　twenty　years；　is；　that　the　common　a　priori
doctrines　and　methods　of　reasoning　about　political　and　social
questions　are　essentially　vicious；　and　that　argumentation　on　this
basis　leads；　with　equal　logical　force；　to　two　contradictory　and
extremely　mischievous　systems；　the　one　that　of　Anarchaic
Individualism；　the　other　that　of　despotic　or　Regimental　Socialism。
Whether　I　am　right　or　wrong；　I　am　at　least　consistent　in　opposing　both
to　the　best　of　my　ability。　Mr。　Booth's　system　appears　to　me；　and；　as　I
have　shown；　is　regarded　by　Socialists　themselves；　to　be　mere
autocratic　Socialism；　masked　by　its　theological　exterior。　That　the
〃fantastic〃　religious　skin　will　wear　away；　and　the　Socialistic　reality
it　covers　will　show　its　real　nature；　is　the　expressed　hope　of　one
candid　Socialist；　and　may　be　fairly　conceived　to　be　the　unexpressed
belief　of　the　despotic　leader　of　the　new　Trades　Union；　who　has　shown
his　zeal；　if　not　his　discretion；　in　championing　Mr。　Booth's　projects。
＇See　Letter　VIII。＇

Yet　another　word　to　commentators　upon　my　letters。　There　are　some　who
rather　chuckle；　and　＇191＇　some　who　sneer；　at　what　they　seem　to
consider　the　dexterity　of　an　〃old　controversial　hand；〃　exhibited　by
the　contrast　which　I　have　drawn　between　the　methods　of　conversion
depicted　in　the　New　Testament　and　those　pursued　by　fanatics　of　the
Salvationist　type；　whether　they　be　such　as　are　now　exploited　by　Mr。
Booth；　or　such　as　those　who；　from　the　time　of　the　Anabaptists；　to　go
no　further　back；　have　worked　upon　similar　lines。

Whether　such　observations　were　intended　to　be　flattering　or　sarcastic；
I　must　respectfully　decline　to　accept　the　compliment；　or　to　apply　the
sarcasm　to　myself。　I　object　to　obliquity　of　procedure　and　ambiguity　of
speech　in　all　shapes。　And　I　confess　that　I　find　it　difficult　to
understand　the　state　of　mind　which　leads　any　one　to　suppose；　that　deep
respect　for　single…minded　devotion　to　high　aims　is　incompatible　with
the　unhesitating　conviction　that　those　aims　include　the　propagation　of
doctrines　which　are　devoid　of　foundationperhaps　even　mischievous。

The　most　degrading　feature　of　the　narrower　forms　of　Christianity　（of
which　that　professed　by　Mr。　Booth　is　a　notable　example）　is　their
insistence　that　the　noblest　virtues；　if　displayed　by　those　who　reject
their　pitiable　formulae；　are；　as　their　pet　phrase　goes；　〃splendid
sins。〃　But　there　is；　perhaps；　one　step　lower；　and　that　is　that　men；
who　profess　freedom　of　thought；　should　fail　to　see　and　＇192＇
appreciate　that　large　soul　of　goodness　which　often　animates　even　the
fanatical　adherents　of　such　tenets。　I　am　sorry　for　any　man　who　can
read　the　epistles　to　the　Galatians　and　the　Corinthians　without
yielding　a　large　meed　of　admiration　to　the　fervent　humanity　of　Paul　of
Tarsus；　who　can　study　the　lives　of　Francis　of　Assisi；　or　of　Catherine
of　Siena；　without　wishing　that；　for　the　furtherance　of　his　own　ideals；
he　might　be　even　as　they；　or　who　can　contemplate　unm