嗔秤戻幣�哉膵�云利匈嬉蝕湊蛸賜�塋床四衲���萩晦編報炎嘔囚^泡仟 ̄云利匈��
the vital message(麼佚)-及28何蛍
酔楯荷恬: 梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈 梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈 梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何! 泌惚云慕短嗤堋響頼���誅卒亮茂�俊彭堋響��辛聞喘貧圭 "辺茄欺厘議箝誓匂" 孔嬬 才 "紗秘慕禰" 孔嬬��
time。 Her hand was controlled and she wrote a quantity of matter which
was entirely outside her own knowledge or character。 Upon her doubting
whether her sub´conscious self might in some way be producing the
67
´ Page 68´
THE VITAL MESSAGE
writing�察�which was partly done by planchette�察�the script was written upside
down and from right to left�察 �as though the writer was seated opposite。
Such script could not possibly be written by the lady herself。 Upon making
enquiry as to who was using her hand�察�the answer came in writing that it
was a certain Fred Gaylord�察�and that his object was to get a message to his
mother。 The youth was unknown to Miss Cameron�察 �but she knew the
family and forwarded the message�察�with the result that the mother came to
see her�察�examined the evidence�察�communicated with the son�察�and finally�察�
returning home�察�buried all her evidences of mourning�察�feeling that the boy
was no more dead in the old sense than if he were alive in a foreign
country。 There is the first proof of preternatural agency�察 �since Miss
Cameron developed so much knowledge which she could not have
normally acquired�察 �using many phrases and ideas which were
characteristic of the deceased。 But mark the sequel。 Gaylord was merely a
pseudonym�察�as the matter was so private that the real name�察�which we will
put as Bridger�察 �was not disclosed。 A few months after the book was
published Miss Cameron received a letter from a stranger living a
thousand miles away。 This letter and the whole correspondence I have
seen。 The stranger�察 �Mrs。 Nicol�察 �says that as a test she would like to ask
whether the real name given as Fred Gaylord in the book is not Fred
Bridger�察 �as she had psychic reasons for believing so。 Miss Cameron
replied that it was so�察�and expressed her great surprise that so secret and
private a matter should have been correctly stated。 Mrs。 Nicol then
explained that she and her husband�察�both connected with journalism and
both absolutely agnostic�察 �had discovered that she had the power of
automatic writing。 That while�察 �using this power she had received
communications purporting to come from Fred Bridger whom they had
known in life�察 �and that upon reading Miss Cameron's book they had
received from Fred Bridger the assurance that he was the same person as
the Fred Gaylord of Miss Cameron。 Now�察 �arguing upon these facts�察 �and
they would appear most undoubtedly to be facts�察�what possible answer can
the materialist or the sceptic give to the assertion that they are a double
proof of the continuity of personality and the possibility of communication�拭�
Can any reasonable system of telepathy explain how Miss Cameron
68
´ Page 69´
THE VITAL MESSAGE
discovered the intimate points characteristic of young Gaylord�拭�And then�察�
how are we afterwards�察�by any possible telepathy�察�to explain the revelation
to Mrs。 Nicol of the identity of her communicant�察�Fred Bridger�察�with the
Fred Gaylord who had been written of by Miss Cameron。 The case for
return seems to me a very convincing one�察�though I contend now�察�as ever�察�
that it is not the return of the lost ones which is of such cogent interest as
the message from the beyond which they bear with them。
C。 SPIRIT PHOTOGRAPHY
On this subject I should recommend the reader to consult Coates'
;Photographing the Invisible�察─�which states�察�in a thoughtful and moderate
way�察�the evidence for this most remarkable phase�察�and illustrates it with
many examples。 It is pointed out that here�察 �as always�察 �fraud must be
carefully guarded against�察�having been admitted in the case of the French
spirit photographer�察�Buguet。 There are�察�however�察�a large number of cases
where the photograph�察�under rigid test conditions in which fraud has been
absolutely barred�察�has reproduced the features of the dead。 Here there are
limitations and restrictions which call for careful study and observation。
These faces of the dead are in some cases as contoured and as
recognisable as they were in life�察 �and correspond with no pre´existing
picture or photograph。 One such case absolutely critic´proof is enough�察�
one would think�察 �to establish survival�察 �and these valid cases are to be
counted not in ones�察 �but in hundreds。 On the other hand�察 �many of the
likenesses�察 �obtained under the same test conditions�察 �are obviously
simulacra or pictures built up by some psychic force�察�not necessarily by
the individual spirits themselves�察 �to represent the dead。 In some
undoubtedly genuine cases it is an exact�察�or almost exact�察�reproduction of
an existing picture�察�as if the conscious intelligent force�察�whatever it might
be�察�had consulted it as to the former appearance of the deceased�察�and had
then built it up in exact accordance with the original。 In such cases the
spirit face may show as a flat surface instead of a contour。 Rigid
examination has shown that the existing model was usually outside the
ken of the photographer。 Two of the bravest champions whom Spiritualism
has ever produced�察�the late W。 T。 Stead and the late Archdeacon Colley
names which will bulk large in days to comeattached great importance to
69
´ Page 70´
THE VITAL MESSAGE
spirit photography as a final and incontestable proof of survival。 In his
recent work�察 �Proofs of the Truth of Spiritualism; ��Kegan Paul���察 �the
eminent botanist�察 �Professor Henslow�察 �has given one case which would
really appear to be above criticism。 He narrates how the inquirer subjected
a sealed packet of plates to the Crewe circle without exposure�察�
endeavoring to get a psychograph。 Upon being asked on which plate he
desired it�察�he said ;the fifth。; Upon this plate being developed�察�there was
found on it a copy of a passage from the Codex Alexandrinus of the New
Testament
酔楯荷恬: 梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈 梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈 梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何!
梁椣戻幣�� 梁心弌傍議揖扮窟燕得胎��傍竃徭失議心隈才凪万弌誌育断蛍�輌臆惨軼僑〃�燕慕得珊辛參資誼持蛍才将刮襲潜��範寔亟圻幹慕得 瓜寡追葎娼得辛參資誼寄楚署衛、持蛍才将刮襲潜填��