shorter logic-第15部分

快捷操作: 按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页 按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页 按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部! 如果本书没有阅读完，想下次继续接着阅读，可使用上方 "收藏到我的浏览器" 功能 和 "加入书签" 功能！



We　said　above　that；　according　to　the　old　belief；　it　was　the　characteristic　right　of
the　mind　to　know　the　truth。　If　this　be　so；　it　also　implies　that　everything　we　know
both　of　outward　and　inward　nature；　in　one　word；　the　objective　world；　is　in　its
own　self　the　same　as　it　is　in　thought；　and　that　to　think　is　to　bring　out　the　truth　of
our　object；　be　it　what　it　may。　The　business　of　philosophy　is　only　to　bring　into
explicit　consciousness　what　the　world　in　all　ages　has　believed　about　thought。
Philosophy　therefore　advances　nothing　new；　and　our　present　discussion　has　led　us
to　a　conclusion　which　agrees　with　the　natural　belief　of　mankind。　



　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　〃Think　for　Yourself〃
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　§　23

（d）　The　real　nature　of　the　object　is　brought　to　light　in　reflection；　but　it　is　no　less
true　that　this　exertion　of　thought　is　my　act。　If　this　be　so；　the　real　nature　is　a
product　of　my　mind；　in　its　character　of　thinking　subject　…　generated　by　me　my
simple　universality；　self…collected　and　removed　from　extraneous　influences　…　in
one　word；　in　my　Freedom。

'Think　for　yourself'　is　a　phrase　which　people　often　use　as　if　it　had　some　special
significance。　The　fact　is；　no　man　can　think　for　another；　any　more　than　he　can　eat
or　drink　for　him　and　the　expression　is　a　pleonasm。　To　think　is　in　fact　ipso　facto　to
be　free；　for　thought　as　the　action　of　the　universal　is　an　abstract　relating　of　self　to
self；　where；　being　at　home　with　ourselves；　and　as　regards　our　subjectivity　utterly
blank；　our　consciousness　is；　in　the　matter　of　its　contents；　only　in　the　fact　and　its
characteristics。　If　this　be　admitted；　and　if　we　apply　the　term　humility　or　modesty
to　an　attitude　where　our　subjectivity　is　not　allowed　to　interfere　by　act　or　quality；　it
is　easy　to　appreciate　the　question　touching　the　humility　or　modesty　and　pride　of
philosophy。　For　in　point　of　contents；　thought　is　only　true　in　proportion　as　it　sinks
itself　in　the　facts；　and　in　point　of　form　it　is　no　private　or　particular　state　or　act　of
the　subject；　but　rather　that　attitude　of　consciousness　where　the　abstract　self；　freed
from　all　the　special　limitations　to　which　its　ordinary　states　or　qualities　are　liable；
restricts　itself　to　that　universal　action　in　which　it　is　identical　with　all　individuals。　In
these　circumstances　philosophy　may　be　acquitted　of　the　charge　of　pride。　And
when　Aristotle　summons　the　mind　to　rise　to　the　dignity　of　that　attitude；　the　dignity
he　seeks　is　won　by　letting　slip　all　our　individual　opinions　and　prejudices；　and
submitting　to　the　sway　of　the　fact。　



　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　The　Objectivity　of　Thought
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　§　24

With　these　explanations　and　qualifications；　thoughts　may　be　termed　Objective
Thoughts　…　among　which　are　also　to　be　included　the　forms　which　are　more
especially　discussed　in　the　common　logic；　where　they　are　usually　treated　as　forms
of　conscious　thought　only。　Logic　therefore　coincides　with　Metaphysics；　the
science　of　things　set　and　held　in　thoughts　…　thoughts　accredited　able　to　express
the　essential　reality　of　things。

An　exposition　of　the　relation　in　which　such　forms　as　notion；　judgment；　and
syllogism　stand　to　others；　such　as　causality；　is　a　matter　for　the　science　itself。　But
this　much　is　evident　beforehand。　If　thought　tries　to　form　a　notion　of　things；　this
notion　（as　well　as　its　proximate　phases；　the　judgement　and　syllogism）　cannot　be
composed　of　articles　and　relations　which　are　alien　and　irrelevant　to　the　things。
Reflection；　it　was　said　above；　conducts　to　the　universal　of　things：　which　universal
is　itself　one　of　the　constituent　factors　of　a　notion。　To　say　that　Reason　or
Understanding　is　in　the　world；　is　equivalent　in　its　import　to　the　phrase　'Objective
Thought'。　The　latter　phrase　however　has　the　inconvenience　that　thought　is　usually
confined　to　express　what　belongs　to　the　mind　or　consciousness　only；　while
objective　is　a　term　applied；　at　least　primarily；　only　to　the　non…mental。　



　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　§24n

（1）　To　speak　of　thought　or　objective　thought　as　the　heart　and　soul　of　the　world；　may　seem　to　be
ascribing　consciousness　to　the　things　of　nature。　We　feel　a　certain　repugnance　against　making
thought　the　inward　function　of　things；　especially　as　we　speak　of　thought　as　marking　the　divergence
of　man　from　nature。　It　would　be　necessary；　therefore；　if　we　use　the　term　thought　at　all；　to　speak　of
nature　as　the　system　of　unconscious　thought；　or；　to　use　Schelling's　expression；　a　petrified
intelligence。　And　in　order　to　prevent　misconception；　'thought…form'　or　'thought…type'　should　be
substituted　for　the　ambiguous　term　thought。

From　what　has　been　said　the　principles　of　logic　are　to　be　sought　in　a　system　of　thought…types　or
fundamental　categories；　in　which　the　opposition　between　subjective　and　objective；　in　its　usual
sense　vanishes。　The　signification　thus　attached　to　thought　and　its　characteristic　forms　may　be
illustrated　by　the　ancient　saying　that　'nous　governs　the　world'；　or　by　our　own　phrase　that　'Reason
is　in　the　world'；　which　means　that　Reason　is　the　soul　of　the　world　it　inhabits；　its　immanent　principle；
its　most　proper　and　inward　nature；　its　universal。　Another　illustration　is　offered　by　the　circumstance
that　in　speaking　of　some　definite　animal　we　say　it　is　（an）　animal。　Now；　the　animal；　qua　animal；
cannot　be　shown；　nothing　can　be　pointed　out　excepting　some　special　animal。　Animal；　qua　animal；
does　not　exist：　it　is　merely　the　universal　nature　of　the　individual　animals；　while　each　existing　animal
is　a　more　concretely　defined　and　particularised　thing。　But　to　be　an　animal　…　the　law　of　kind　which　is
the　universal　in　this　case　…　is　the　property　of　the　particular　animal；　and　constitutes　its　definite
essence。　Take　away　from　the　dog　its　animality；　and　it　becomes　impossible　to　say　what　it　is。　All
things　have　a　permanent　inward　nature；　as　well　as　an　outward　existence。　They　live　and　die；　arise
and　pass　away；　but　their　essential　and　universal　part　is　the　kind；　and　this　means　much　more　than
something　common　to　them　all。

If　thought　is　the　constitutive　substance　of　external　things；　it　is　also　the　universal　substance　of　what　is
spiritual。　In　all　human　perception　thought　is　present；　so　too　thought　is　the　universal　in　all　the　acts　of
conception　and　recollection；　in　short；　in　every　mental　activity；　in　willing；　wishing；　and　the　like。　All
these　faculties　are　only　further　specialisations　of　thought。　When　it　is　presented　in　this　light；　thought
has　a　different　part　to　play　from　what　it　has　if　we　speak　of　a　faculty　of　thought；　one　among　a
crowd　of　other　faculties；　such　as　perception；　conception；　and　will；　with　which　it　stands　on　the
same　level。　When　it　is　seen　to　be　the　true　universal　of　all　that　nature　and　mind　contain；　it　extends　its
scope　far　beyond　all　these；　and　becomes　the　basis　of　everything。　From　this　view　of　thought；　in　its
objective　meaning　as　nous；　we　may　next　pass　to　consider　the　subjective　sense　of　the　term。　We
say　first；　Man　is　a　being　that　thinks；　but　we　also　say　at　the　same　time；　Man　is　a　being　that
perceives　and　wills。　Man　is　a　thinker；　and　is　universal；　but　he　is　a　thinker　only　because　he　feels　his
own　universality。　The　animal