shorter logic-第6部分

快捷操作: 按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页 按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页 按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部! 如果本书没有阅读完，想下次继续接着阅读，可使用上方 "收藏到我的浏览器" 功能 和 "加入书签" 功能！


the　question；　that　existence　is　in　part　mere　appearance；　and　only　in　part　actuality。
In　common　life；　any　freak　of　fancy；　any　error；　evil　and　everything　of　the　nature
of　evil；　as　well　as　every　degenerate　and　transitory　existence　whatever；　gets　in　a
casual　way　the　name　of　actuality。　But　even　our　ordinary　feelings　are　enough　to
forbid　a　casual　（fortuitous）　existence　getting　the　emphatic　name　of　an　actual；　for
by　fortuitous　we　mean　an　existence　which　has　no　greater　value　than　that　of
something　possible；　which　may　as　well　not　be　as　be。　As　for　the　term　Actuality；
these　critics　would　have　done　well　to　consider　the　sense　in　which　I　employ　it。　In　a
detailed　Logic　I　had　treated　among　other　things　of　actuality；　and　accurately
distinguished　it　not　only　from　the　fortuitous；　which；　after　all；　has　existence；　but
even　from　the　cognate　categories　of　existence　and　the　other　modifications　of
being。　

The　actuality　of　the　rational　stands　opposed　by　the　popular　fancy　that　Ideas　and
ideals　are　nothing　but　chimeras；　and　philosophy　a　mere　system　of　such
phantasms。　It　is　also　opposed　by　the　very　different　fancy　that　Ideas　and　ideals　are
something　far　too　excellent　to　have　actuality；　or　something　too　impotent　to
procure　it　for　themselves。　This　divorce　between　idea　and　reality　is　especially　dear
to　the　analytic　understanding　which　looks　upon　its　own　abstractions；　dreams
though　they　are；　as　something　true　and　real；　and　prides　itself　on　the　imperative
'ought'；　which　it　takes　especial　pleasure　in　prescribing　even　on　the　field　of　politics。
As　if　the　world　had　waited　on　it　to　learn　how　it　ought　to　be；　and　was　not！　For；　if　it
were　as　it　ought　to　be；　what　would　come　of　the　precocious　wisdom　of　that
'ought'？　When　understanding　turns　this　'ought'　against　trivial　external　and
transitory　objects；　against　social　regulations　or　conditions；　which　very　likely
possess　a　great　relative　importance　for　a　certain　time　and　special　circles；　it　may
often　be　right。　In　such　a　case　the　intelligent　observer　may　meet　much　that　fails　to
satisfy　the　general　requirements　of　right；　for　who　is　not　acute　enough　to　see　a
great　deal　in　his　own　surroundings　which　is　really　far　from　being　as　it　ought　to　be？
But　such　acuteness　is　mistaken　in　the　conceit　that；　when　it　examines　these　objects
and　pronounces　what　they　ought　to　be；　it　is　dealing　with　questions　of　philosophic
science。　The　object　of　philosophy　is　the　Idea：　and　the　Idea　is　not　so　impotent　as
merely　to　have　a　right　or　an　obligation　to　exist　without　actually　existing。　The
object　of　philosophy　is　an　actuality　of　which　those　objects；　social　regulations　and
conditions；　are　only　the　superficial　outside。　

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　§7

Thus　reflection　…　thinking　things　over　…　in　a　general　way　involves　the　principle
（which　also　means　the　beginning）　of　philosophy。　And　when　the　reflective　spirit
arose　again　in　its　independence　in　modern　times；　after　the　epoch　of　the　Lutheran
Reformation；　it　did　not；　as　in　its　beginnings　among　the　Greeks；　stand　merely
aloof；　in　a　world　of　its　own；　but　at　once　turned　its　energies　also　upon　the
apparently　illimitable　material　of　the　phenomenal　world。　In　this　way　the　name
philosophy　came　to　be　applied　to　all　those　branches　of　knowledge；　which　are
engaged　in　ascertaining　the　standard　and　Universal　in　the　ocean　of　empirical
individualities；　as　well　as　in　ascertaining　the　Necessary　element；　or　Laws；　to　be
found　in　the　apparent　disorder　of　the　endless　masses　of　the　fortuitous。　It　thus
appears　that　modern　philosophy　derives　its　materials　from　our　own　personal
observations　and　perceptions　of　the　external　and　internal　world；　from　nature　as
well　as　from　the　mind　and　heart　of　man；　when　both　stand　in　the　immediate
presence　of　the　observer。　

This　principle　of　Experience　carries　with　it　the　unspeakably　important　condition
that；　in　order　to　accept　and　believe　any　fact；　we　must　be　in　contact　with　it；　or；　in
more　exact　terms；　that　we　must　find　the　fact　united　and　combined　with　the
certainty　of　our　own　selves。　We　must　be　in　touch　with　our　subject…matter；
whether　it　be　by　means　of　our　external　senses；　or；　else；　by　our　profounder　mind
and　our　intimate　self…consciousness。　This　principle　is　the　same　as　that　which　has
in　the　present　day　been　termed　faith；　immediate　knowledge；　the　revelation　in　the
outward　world；　and；　above　all；　in　our　own　heart。　

Those　sciences；　which　thus　got　the　name　of　philosophy；　we　call　empirical
sciences；　for　the　reason　that　they　take　their　departure　from　experience。　Still　the
essential　results　which　they　aim　at　and　provide　are　laws；　general　propositions；　a
theory　…　the　thoughts　of　what　is　found　existing。　On　this　ground　the　Newtonian
physics　was　called　Natural　Philosophy。　Hugo　Grotius；　again；　by　putting　together
and　comparing　the　behaviour　of　states　towards　each　other　as　recorded　in　history；
succeeded；　with　the　help　of　the　ordinary　methods　of　general　reasoning；　in　laying
down　certain　general　principles；　and　establishing　a　theory　which　may　be　termed
the　Philosophy　of　International　Law。　In　England　this　is　still　the　usual　signification
of　the　term　philosophy。　Newton　continues　to　be　celebrated　as　the　greatest　of
philosophers：　and　the　name　goes　down　as　far　as　the　price…lists　of
instrument…makers。　All　instruments；　such　as　the　thermometer　and　barometer；
which　do　not　come　under　the　special　head　of　magnetic　or　electric　apparatus；　are
styled　philosophical　instruments。　Surely　thought；　and　not　a　mere　combination　of
wood；　iron；　etc。；　ought　to　be　called　the　instrument　of　philosophy！　The　recent
science　of　Political　Economy　in　particular；　which　in　Germany　is　known　as
Rational　Economy　of　the　State；　or　intelligent　national　economy；　has　in　England
especially　appropriated　the　name　of　philosophy。　

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　§8

In　its　own　field　this　empirical　knowledge　may　at　first　give　satisfaction；　but　in　two
ways　it　is　seen　to　come　short。　In　the　first　place　there　is　another　circle　of　objects
which　it　does　not　embrace。　These　are　Freedom；　Spirit；　and　God。　They　belong　to
a　different　sphere；　not　because　it　can　be　said　that　they　have　nothing　to　do　with
experience；　for　though　they　are　certainly　not　experiences　of　the　senses；　it　is　quite
an　identical　proposition　to　say　that　whatever　is　in　consciousness　is　experienced。
The　real　ground　for　assigning　them　to　another　field　of　cognition　is　that　in　their
scope　and　content　these　objects　evidently　show　themselves　as　infinite。　

There　is　an　old　phrase　often　wrongly　attributed　to　Aristotle；　and　supposed　to
express　the　general　tenor　of　his　philosophy。　Nihil　est　in　intellectu　quod　non　fuerit
in　sensu：　there　is　nothing　in　thought　which　has　not　been　in　sense　and　experience。
If　speculative　philosophy　refused　to　admit　this　maxim；　it　can　only　have　done　so
from　a　misunderstanding。　It　will；　however；　on　the　converse　side　no　less　assert：
Nihil　est　in　sensu　quod！　non　fuerit　in　intellectu。　And　this　may　be　taken　in　two
senses。　In　the　general　sense　it　means　that　nous　or　spirit　（the　more　profound　idea
of　nous　in　modern　thought）　is　the　cause　of　the　world。　In　its　special　meaning　（see　§
2）　it　asserts　that　the　sentiment　of　right；　morals；　and　religion　is　a　sentiment　（and　in
that　way　an　experience