shorter logic-第86部分

快捷操作: 按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页 按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页 按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部! 如果本书没有阅读完，想下次继续接着阅读，可使用上方 "收藏到我的浏览器" 功能 和 "加入书签" 功能！


every　appetite。　Appetite　is；　so　to　speak；　the　conviction　that　the　subjective　is　only　a
half…truth；　no　more　adequate　than　the　objective。　But　appetite　in　the　second　place
carries　out　its　conviction。　It　brings　about　the　supersession　of　these　finites：　it
cancels　the　antithesis　between　the　objective　which　would　be　and　stay　an　objective
only；　and　the　subjective　which　in　like　manner　would　be　and　stay　a　subjective
only。　

As　regards　the　action　of　the　End；　attention　may　be　called　to　the　fact；　that　in　the
syllogism；　which　represents　that　action；　and　shows　the　end　closing　with　itself　by
the　means　of　realisation；　the　radical　feature　is　the　negation　of　the　termini　That
negation　is　the　one　just　mentioned　both　of　the　immediate　subjectivity　appearing　in
the　End　as　such；　and　of　the　immediate　objectivity　as　seen　in　the　means　and　the
objects　presupposed。　This　is　the　same　negation　as　is　in　operation　when　the　mind
leaves　the　contingent　things　of　the　world　as　well　as　its　own　subjectivity　and　rises
to　God。　It　is　the　'moment'　or　factor　which　（as　noticed　in　the　Introduction　and　§
192）　was　overlooked　and　neglected　in　the　analytic　form　of　syllogisms；　under
which　the　so…called　proofs　of　the　Being　of　a　God　presented　this　elevation。　



　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　§　205

In　its　primary　and　immediate　aspect　the　Teleological　relation　is　external　design；
and　the　notion　confronts　a　presupposed　object。　The　End　is　consequently　finite；
and　that　partly　in　its　content；　partly　in　the　circumstance　that　it　has　an　external
condition　in　the　object；　which　has　to　be　found　existing；　and　which　is　taken　as
material　for　its　realisation。　Its　self…determining　is　to　that　extent　in　form　only。　The
unmediatedness　of　the　End　has　the　further　result　that　its　particularity　or　content　…
which　as　form…characteristic　is　the　subjectivity　of　the　End　…　is　reflected　into　self；
and　so　different　from　the　totality　of　the　form；　subjectivity　in　general；　the　notion。
This　variety　constitutes　the　finitude　of　Design　within　its　own　nature。　The　content
of　the　End；　in　this　way；　is　quite　as　limited；　contingent；　and　given；　as　the　object　is
particular　and　found　ready　to　hand。　

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　§　205n

Generally　speaking；　the　final　cause　is　taken　to　mean　nothing　more　than　external　design。　In
accordance　with　this　view　of　it；　things　are　supposed　not　to　carry　their　vocation　in　themselves；　but
merely　to　be　means　employed　and　spent　in　realising　a　purpose　which　lies　outside　of　them。　That
may　be　said　to　be　the　point　of　view　taken　by　Utility；　which　once　played　a　great　part　even　in　the
sciences；　but　of　late　has　fallen　into　merited　disrepute；　now　that　people　have　begun　to　see　that　it
failed　to　give　a　genuine　insight　into　the　nature　of　things。　It　is　true　that　finite　things　as　finite　ought　in
justice　to　be　viewed　as　non…ultimate；　and　as　pointing　beyond　themselves。　This　negativity　of　finite
things　however　is　their　own　dialectic；　and　in　order　to　ascertain　it　we　must　pay　attention　to　their
positive　content。　

Teleological　observations　on　things　often　proceed　from　a　well…meant　wish　to　display　the　wisdom
of　God　as　it　is　especially　revealed　in　nature。　Now　in　thus　trying　to　discover　final　causes　for　which
the　things　serve　as　means；　we　must　remember　that　we　are　stopping　short　at　the　finite；　and　are
liable　to　fall　into　trifling　reflections：　as；　for　instance；　if　we　not　merely　studied　the　vine　in　respect　of
its　well…known　use　for　man；　but　proceeded　to　consider　the　cork…tree　in　connection　with　the　corks
which　are　cut　from　its　bark　to　put　into　the　wine…bottles。　Whole　books　used　to　be　written　in　this
spirit。　It　is　easy　to　see　that　they　promoted　the　genuine　interest　neither　of　religion　nor　of　science。
External　design　stands　immediately　in　front　of　the　idea：　but　what　thus　stands　on　the　threshold　often
for　that　reason　is　least　adequate。　



　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　§　206

The　teleological　relation　is　a　syllogism　in　which　the　subjective　end　coalesces　with
the　objectivity　external　to　it；　through　a　middle　term　which　is　the　unity　of　both。
This　unity　is　on　one　hand　the　purposive　action；　on　the　other　the　Means；　i。e。
objectivity　made　directly　subservient　to　purpose。　

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　§　206n

The　development　from　End　to　Idea　ensues　by　three　stages；　first；　Subjective　End；　second；　End　in
process　of　accomplishment；　and　third；　End　accomplished。　First　of　all　we　have　the　Subjective　End；
and　that；　as　the　notion　in　independent　being；　is　itself　the　totality　of　the　elementary　functions　of　the
notion。　The　first　of　these　functions　is　that　of　self…identical　universality；　as　it　were　the　neutral　first
water；　in　which　everything　is　involved；　but　nothing　as　yet　discriminated。　The　second　of　these
elements　is　the　particularising　of　this　universal；　by　which　it　acquires　a　specific　content。　As　this
specific　content　again　is　realised　by　the　agency　of　the　universal；　the　latter　returns　by　its　means　back
to　itself；　and　coalesces　with　itself。　Hence　too　when　we　set　some　end　before　us；　we　say　that　we
'conclude'　to　do　something：　a　phrase　which　implies　that　we　were；　so　to　speak；　open　and
accessible　to　this　or　that　determination。　Similarly　we　also　at　a　further　step　speak　of　a　man
'resolving'　to　do　something；　meaning　that　the　agent　steps　forward　out　of　his　self…regarding
inwardness　and　enters　into　dealings　with　the　environing　objectivity。　This　supplies　the　step　from　the
merely　Subjective　End　to　the　purposive　action　which　tends　outwards。　



　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　§　207

（1）　The　first　syllogism　of　the　final　cause　represents　the　Subjective　End。　The
universal　notion　is　brought　to　unite　with　individuality　by　means　of　particularity；　so
that　the　individual　as　self…determination　acts　as　judge。　That　is　to　say；　it　not　only
particularises　or　makes　into　a　determinate　content　the　still　indeterminate　universal；
but　also　explicitly　puts　an　antithesis　of　subjectivity　and　objectivity；　and　at　the
same　time　is　in　its　own　self　a　return　to　itself；　for　it　stamps　the　subjectivity　of　the
notion；　presupposed　as　against　objectivity；　with　the　mark　of　defect；　in　comparison
with　the　complete　and　rounded　totality；　and　thereby　at　the　same　time　turns
outwards。　



　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　§　208

（2）　This　action　which　is　directed　outwards　is　the　individuality；　which　in　the
Subjective　End　is　identical　with　the　particularity　under　which；　along　with　the
content；　is　also　comprised　the　external　objectivity。　It　throws　itself　in　the　first　place
immediately　upon　the　object；　which　it　appropriates　to　itself　as　a　Means。　The
notion　is　this　immediate　power；　for　the　notion　is　the　self…identical　negativity；　in
which　the　being　of　the　object　is　characterised　as　wholly　and　merely　ideal。　The
whole　Middle　Term　is　this　inward　power　of　the　notion；　in　the　shape　of　an　agency；
with　which　the　object　as　Means　is　immediately　united　and　in　obedience　to　which
it　stands。　

In　finite　teleology　the　Middle　Term　is　broken　up　into　two　elements　external　to
each　other；　（a）　the　action　and　（b）　the　object　which　serves　as　Means。　The　relation
of　the　final　cause　as　power　to　this　object；　and　the　subjugation　of　the　object　to　it；
is　immediate　（it　forms　the　first　premise　i