the writings-3-第25部分

快捷操作: 按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页 按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页 按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部! 如果本书没有阅读完，想下次继续接着阅读，可使用上方 "收藏到我的浏览器" 功能 和 "加入书签" 功能！



the　abolition　should　be　gradual；　second；　that　it　should　be　on　a

vote　of　the　majority　of　qualified　voters　in　the　District；　and

third；　that　compensation　should　be　made　to　unwilling　owners。

With　these　three　conditions；　I　confess　I　would　be　exceedingly

glad　to　see　Congress　abolish　slavery　in　the　District　of　Columbia；

and；　in　the　language　of　Henry　Clay；　〃sweep　from　our　capital　that

foul　blot　upon　our　nation。〃



In　regard　to　the　fifth　interrogatory；　I　must　say　here　that；　as　to

the　question　of　the　abolition　of　the　slave…trade　between　the

different　States；　I　can　truly　answer；　as　I　have；　that　I　am

pledged　to　nothing　about　it。　　It　is　a　subject　to　which　I　have　not

given　that　mature　consideration　that　would　make　me　feel

authorized　to　state　a　position　so　as　to　hold　myself　entirely

bound　by　it。　　In　other　words；　that　question　has　never　been

prominently　enough　before　me　to　induce　me　to　investigate　whether

we　really　have　the　constitutional　power　to　do　it。　　I　could

investigate　it　if　I　had　sufficient　time　to　bring　myself　to　a

conclusion　upon　that　subject；　but　I　have　not　done　so；　and　I　say

so　frankly　to　you　here；　and　to　Judge　Douglas。　　I　must　say；

however；　that　if　I　should　be　of　opinion　that　Congress　does

possess　the　constitutional　power　to　abolish　the　slave…trade　among

the　different　States；　I　should　still　not　be　in　favor　of　the

exercise　of　that　power；　unless　upon　some　conservative　principle

as　I　conceive　it；　akin　to　what　I　have　said　in　relation　to　the

abolition　of　slavery　in　the　District　of　Columbia。



My　answer　as　to　whether　I　desire　that　slavery　should　be

prohibited　in　all　the　Territories　of　the　United　States　is　full

and　explicit　within　itself；　and　cannot　be　made　clearer　by　any

comments　of　mine。　　So　I　suppose　in　regard　to　the　question　whether

I　am　opposed　to　the　acquisition　of　any　more　territory　unless

slavery　is　first　prohibited　therein；　my　answer　is　such　that　I

could　add　nothing　by　way　of　illustration；　or　making　myself　better

understood；　than　the　answer　which　I　have　placed　in　writing。



Now　in　all　this　the　Judge　has　me；　and　he　has　me　on　the　record。　　I

suppose　he　had　flattered　himself　that　I　was　really　entertaining

one　set　of　opinions　for　one　place；　and　another　set　for　another

place；　that　I　was　afraid　to　say　at　one　place　what　I　uttered　at

another。　　What　I　am　saying　here　I　suppose　I　say　to　a　vast

audience　as　strongly　tending　to　Abolitionism　as　any　audience　in

the　State　of　Illinois；　and　I　believe　I　am　saying　that　which；　if

it　would　be　offensive　to　any　persons　and　render　them　enemies　to

myself；　would　be　offensive　to　persons　in　this

audience。



I　now　proceed　to　propound　to　the　Judge　the　interrogatories；　so

far　as　I　have　framed　them。　　I　will　bring　forward　a　new

installment　when　I　get　them　ready。　　I　will　bring　them　forward　now

only　reaching　to　number　four。

The　first　one　is：



Question　1。If　the　people　of　Kansas　shall；　by　means　entirely

unobjectionable　in　all　other　respects；　adopt　a　State

constitution；　and　ask　admission　into　the　Union　under　it；　before

they　have　the　requisite　number　of　inhabitants　according　to　the

English　bill；some　ninety…three　thousand；will　you　vote　to

admit　them？



Q。　　2。Can　the　people　of　a　United　States　Territory；　in　any

lawful　way；　against　the　wish　of　any　citizen　of　the　United　States；

exclude　slavery　from　its　limits　prior　to　the　formation　of　a　State

constitution？



Q。　　3。　　If　the　Supreme　Court　of　the　United　States　shall　decide

that　States　cannot　exclude　slavery　from　their　limits；　are　you　in

favor　of　acquiescing　in；　adopting；　and　following　such　decision　as

a　rule　of　political　action？



Q。　　4。　　Are　you　in　favor　of　acquiring　additional　territory；　in

disregard　of　how　such　acquisition　may　affect　the　nation　on　the

slavery　question？



As　introductory　to　these　interrogatories　which　Judge　Douglas

propounded　to　me　at　Ottawa；　he　read　a　set　of　resolutions　which　he

said　Judge　Trumbull　and　myself　had　participated　in　adopting；　in

the　first　Republican　State　Convention；　held　at　Springfield　in

October；　1854。　　He　insisted　that　I　and　Judge　Trumbull；　and

perhaps　the　entire　Republican　party；　were　responsible　for　the

doctrines　contained　in　the　set　of　resolutions　which　he　read；　and

I　understand　that　it　was　from　that　set　of　resolutions　that　he

deduced　the　interrogatories　which　he　propounded　to　me；　using

these　resolutions　as　a　sort　of　authority　for　propounding　those

questions　to　me。　　Now；　I　say　here　to…day　that　I　do　not　answer　his

interrogatories　because　of　their　springing　at　all　from　that　set

of　resolutions　which　he　read。　　I　answered　them　because　Judge

Douglas　thought　fit　to　ask　them。　　I　do　not　now；　nor　ever　did；

recognize　any　responsibility　upon　myself　in　that　set　of

resolutions。　　When　I　replied　to　him　on　that　occasion；　I　assured

him　that　I　never　had　anything　to　do　with　them。　　I　repeat　here　to

today　that　I　never　in　any　possible　form　had　anything　to　do　with

that　set　of　resolutions　　It　turns　out；　I　believe；　that　those

resolutions　were　never　passed　in　any　convention　held　in

Springfield。



It　turns　out　that　they　were　never　passed　at　any　convention　or　any

public　meeting　that　I　had　any　part　in。　　I　believe　it　turns　out；

in　addition　to　all　this；　that　there　was　not；　in　the　fall　of　1854；

any　convention　holding　a　session　in　Springfield；　calling　itself　a

Republican　State　Convention；　yet　it　is　true　there　was　a

convention；　or　assemblage　of　men　calling　themselves　a　convention；

at　Springfield；　that　did　pass　some　resolutions。　　But　so　little

did　I　really　know　of　the　proceedings　of　that　convention；　or　what

set　of　resolutions　they　had　passed；　though　having　a　general

knowledge　that　there　had　been　such　an　assemblage　of　men　there；

that　when　Judge　Douglas　read　the　resolutions；　I　really　did　not

know　but　they　had　been　the　resolutions　passed　then　and　there。　　I

did　not　question　that　they　were　the　resolutions　adopted。　　For　I

could　not　bring　myself　to　suppose　that　Judge　Douglas　could　say

what　he　did　upon　this　subject　without　knowing　that　it　was　true。

I　contented　myself；　on　that　occasion；　with　denying；　as　I　truly

could；　all　connection　with　them；　not　denying　or　affirming　whether

they　were　passed　at　Springfield。　　Now；　it　turns　out　that　he　had

got　hold　of　some　resolutions　passed　at　some　convention　or　public

meeting　in　Kane　County。　　I　wish　to　say　here；　that　I　don't

conceive　that　in　any　fair　and　just　mind　this　discovery　relieves

me　at　all。　　I　had　just　as　much　to　do　with　the　convention　in　Kane

County　as　that　at　Springfield。　　I　am　as　much　responsible　for　the

resolutions　at　Kane　County　as　those　at　Springfield；the　amount

of　the　responsibility　being　exactly　nothing　in　either　case；　no

more　than　there　would　be　in　regard　to　a　set　of　resolutions　passed

in　the　moon。



I　allude　to　this　extraordinary　matter　in　this　canvass　for　some

further　purpose　than　anything　yet　advanced。　　Judge　Douglas　did

not　make　his　statement　upon　that　occasion　as　matters　that　he

believed　to　be　true；　but　he　stated　them　roundly　as　being　true；　in

such　form　as　to　ple